My first thought upon reading the title of chapter three-‘theoretical perspectives’ from this weeks readings was that I thought PR was a pretty self explanatory occupation and that it didn’t need any theoretical mumbo-jumbo to get the job done. However upon reading this chapter I was enlightened to say the least. Previously, I did not even know there was a theory relating to public relations let alone many of them. The first sentence links theoretical perspectives to “road maps” which got me thinking that possibly one could adopt such perspectives from a theory one relates to and use it to mould their own personal style of PR.
The readings made me think more about public relations theory and practice in that I could see that there is more than one way to conduct PR. I could see how the relationship management approach would greatly aid an organization in finding out where they stand with their publics, which I can see is vital to its survival and success. Also, the generalists systems theory allowed me to visualise more clearly the links between organizations, their publics and PR practitioners.
I think the key points to remember from this week’s readings related to Grunig’s two-way symmetrical model, also known as the ‘excellent model’ within public relations. J.E. Grunig noted that the values within this model are negotiation, collaboration and compromise, which I think clearly articulates the values of a successful practitioner. When I look at a powerful organization like McDonalds I can see that they have comprised to keep up with social values. For example, Australians’ standards for nutritional information are growing and hence McDonalds have started to list their products’ nutritional value on each packet. I believe that these values must form part of a practitioner’s professional values to ensure that their work is ethical and effective.
I commented Emma Murphy's blog for this week.
The readings made me think more about public relations theory and practice in that I could see that there is more than one way to conduct PR. I could see how the relationship management approach would greatly aid an organization in finding out where they stand with their publics, which I can see is vital to its survival and success. Also, the generalists systems theory allowed me to visualise more clearly the links between organizations, their publics and PR practitioners.
I think the key points to remember from this week’s readings related to Grunig’s two-way symmetrical model, also known as the ‘excellent model’ within public relations. J.E. Grunig noted that the values within this model are negotiation, collaboration and compromise, which I think clearly articulates the values of a successful practitioner. When I look at a powerful organization like McDonalds I can see that they have comprised to keep up with social values. For example, Australians’ standards for nutritional information are growing and hence McDonalds have started to list their products’ nutritional value on each packet. I believe that these values must form part of a practitioner’s professional values to ensure that their work is ethical and effective.
I commented Emma Murphy's blog for this week.
References
1)Chapter 3 of Public relations: theory and practice / edited by Jane Johnston and Clara Zawawi. Crows Nest, N.S.W. Allen & Unwin, 2004. 2nd ed.
2)Gower, K (2006) Public Relations Research at the Crossroads in Journal of Public Relations Research. 18 (2), 177-190.